At a recent event, a man came over to introduce himself. He explained that he was a project manager and wanted to “pick my brain on something”. I inquired about the kind of projects he typically engaged.
“Oh, system implementations with budgets of $1-2 million.”
It occurred to me at the time that project budget is a useless but commonly used metric. What does it tell us about the size or complexity of projects this gentleman runs? Nothing, for different organizations go about projects differently. Some throw money at it, hire dedicated teams, buy the best equipment, and involve consultants. Others spend as little as possible relying solely on internal resources, adding the project to a list of responsibilities for a few people within the organization. It is meaningless to compare the two projects on a basis of budget because the approach is so diverse.
Furthermore, an argument can be made that the same project carried out on a strict budget is more challenging and speaks to the mastery of the project manager and abilities of his team. After all, which chef is more skilled, the one who prepares a delicious meal from a limited number of ingredients in a field kitchen or the one who whips up the same meal from a fully stocked pantry, in a restaurant kitchen with a crew of helpers?
The question on budgets is often posed in job interviews, but the truth is, you should never base your decision on the answer. This metric has no meaning and should not be used.

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 15, 2009 at 4:16 am
Peter Thomas
Staff managed is another metric that may conceal more than it reveals.
Having recently both run a department of 30 and been a one-man-band in an internal consultancy position, I am very clear which requires greater “management” skills; definitely the latter, because you need to work via influence and building relationships. While I tend to like to take this approach with people working for me as well, the dynamic is different when there is a reporting relationship.
Still people like to tick boxes don’t they (as per http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/pigeonholing-a-tragedy/)
Peter
April 15, 2009 at 7:32 am
bizvortex
Exactly right. A friend of mine recently went for an interview, having just completed an under resourced project, which was a fantastic feat: an ERP implementation completed in 4 months, lots of hard decisions to make, tremendous stress.
The interviewer was not impressed: she was told that in that organization, projects under 6 months are considered “small”. Talk about pigeonholing !
April 15, 2009 at 4:17 am
Peter Thomas
Or http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/pigeonholing-a-tragedy/ even – without the trailing ‘)’
Peter
April 15, 2009 at 8:48 am
Peter Thomas
It is sometimes difficult to get past people’s preconceptions in areas like this isn’t it?
Peter
April 15, 2009 at 8:56 am
bizvortex
It is very hard to hire talent going about it the way organizations do it today. Next to impossible.
Here is a link to a woman singing on Britain’s Got Talent – no credentials, no certifications, no years of schooling, no “years in the industry”, just darn raw talent.
Personally, I can correct it for any organization, but HR is too in love with their deficient methods and line managers just do what they are used to, so it is not on anybody’s radar.
April 15, 2009 at 8:59 am
Peter Thomas
Maybe I should take up singing – but then that’s not the greatest option with my voice
April 15, 2009 at 8:52 am
Peter Thomas
BTW eventually got round to adding you to my recommended sites list at http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/about-this-site/please-add-my-site-to-the-recommended-list/ way overdue – apologies.
Peter
April 15, 2009 at 8:57 am
bizvortex
Cheers!